Military aircraft owned by shell corporations and hedge funds are not British Military aircraft. They are not owned by the RAF, & not solely flown by RAF crews or indeed under RAF orders.
Damage to corporate owned goods is not sabotaging the United Kingdom’s services, and throwing or adding bright paint to a Corporate owned vehicle is not an act of terror towards anyone.
No person was placed at any risk of harm. No structural or long-term dage incurred. It was at worse a political statement, one that could in the very extreme, lead to charges of trespass and criminal damage.
The vehicles in question likely were being used from a UK RAF base assisting a foreign power to commit acts of war, genocide and Crimes against Humanity.
The British government denied that any RAF crews or aircraft were used to support the, in my opinion out of control rogue state. If that is the case, these aircraft, given their type and role are the only aircraft that could have been flying with British insignia in this role. If that is the actual case, serious questions need to be asked of Parliament as to why these aircraft, identifying as British military were in this role under false colours, thereby putting the UK at risk of being forcibly drawn in to a conflict that is not ours to fight.
So Keir Starmer please explain why this has not happened and why it is uk demonstrating citizens being held to account, not the private company placing all our lives at risk from foreign powers?
FAO The Labour Party United Nations Human Rights Metropolitan Police Service The Mirror The Morning Star @highlight #genocide #corporate #WarCrimes
Jonesy, simply a human 